Categories
Uncategorized

Using Network Analysis for Law Enforcement

In a recent paper by the International Association of Crime Analysts (IACA), social network analysis (SNA) has proven to be a useful and important tool in crime analysis. More specifically, it helps law enforcement to better understand criminal networks, co-offending patterns, victimization, drug trafficking networks, as well as many more areas. The value in applying network analysis to crime lies in the main idea of identifying who a person of interest associates with, how strong these associations are and attempt to predict future actions of these POIs.

One specific idea this paper discusses is Mark Granovetter’s concepts of strong and weak ties between two nodes, or in this case between two people. For example, strong ties could represent family and close friend relationships while weak ties could represent acquaintances. In particular, the concept of the “forbidden triad” (Figure 2) is especially relevant to crime analysis. This concept of the “forbidden triad” is essentially the same concept as strong triadic closure that is discussed in CSCC46 material, which is the concept that asserts that if a node A shares a strong tie with node B and A also shares a strong tie with node C, then B and C should share at least a weak tie (B and C should share a weak or strong). In a real-life social sense, if these nodes were people, then persons B and C should at least have an awareness of each other. As described in this paper, “if John (A) is a suspect in a crime, it may be that while Bob (B) may have more information to share about John, Tim (C) might be more willing to share the limited (but potentially very useful) information he has with detectives assigned to the case.”

Another example of information that can be uncovered through applying network analysis to crime networks is the identification of “key players.” In an analysis of a given crime network, the visual output would resemble a graph (Figure 3), displaying nodes representing either individual persons or larger groups or entities and edges between these nodes representing an association between two persons or groups. From simple inspection and from further mathematical analysis (e.g. betweenness, closeness centrality) it can be concluded that nodes E and G play important parts in the flow of information in this network. The paper also explains that one of the most common network strategies to detect these key players centers around the concept of betweenness, which is an idea that has also been discussed in CSCC46 course material.

One case example of social network analysis having a positive impact on crime analysis involves the Richmond, Virginia Police Department searching for a homicide suspect for approximately one month, at which point their crime analysis department decided to construct a network analysis of the suspect’s social network. From this analysis, they identified key persons and quickly notified them that the suspect was wanted and were told to tell police if they would be in contact with the suspect. It turned out that because of the police contact, the suspect turned themselves in within hours. The paper explains that in this scenario, social network analysis assisted law enforcement in identifying key persons related to the suspect beyond just family members and close friends.

LINK: https://crimegunintelcenters.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/iacawp_2018_02_social_network_analysis.pdf

Categories
Uncategorized

Passing Networks in Soccer

Football (soccer) has been an immensely important part of my life from which friendships have been made and a great appreciation has been developed through watching and analyzing the game. More specifically, there are an infinite amount of aspects that can be considered including space, passing patterns, and player synergy or connections. Relating to CSCC46: Social and Information Networks, one would think some of these ideas can be directly related to network science. With the increased collection size of sport statistics collected throughout every game a soccer team plays, there surely must be someone who has applied network science to soccer, right?

J.M. Buldu et al. are a team of researchers who have done just that, and in their paper, Using network science to analyze football passing networks: dynamics, space, time and the multilayer nature of the game, they discuss in more detail this connection. The paper details multiple and more complex concepts, but here I will describe some of these concepts and how they relate to CSCC46. Specifically, for one network model, they constructed a network based on passing from player to player for one game. To construct this network, they used statistics collected for the team FC Barcelona in a game against Real Madrid CF in 2018 (Figure 1).

Figure 1 – Construction of a passing network for FC Barcelona. In this example, passes from the match Real Madrid –Barcelona of the Spanish national league “La Liga”, season 2017/2018. Link widths are proportional to the number of passes between players, whose position in the network is given by the average position of all their passes. Data provided by Opta.

Similar to concepts introduced in CSCC46, some of the key ideas J.M. Buldu et al. discuss are the directed and weighted nature of the network representing the direction and quantity of passing from player to player, the betweenness of edges which accounts how many times a given player passing connection is necessary for completing a passing route between any two players in the team, and the clustering coefficient which measures the number of neighbours of a player that have passing connections between themselves.

So, what meaning or practical information can be derived from these network attributes? Well it is hard to say exactly as this connection between network and soccer is relatively new, but some possible conclusions can be speculated. For example, most obviously and simplistically, highly weighted edges in both directions between two given players means they share many passes and might suggest these two players have strong synergy. Additionally (or alternatively), it may suggest that the two positions in which each of these two players play share a commonly used passing lane or connection. Perhaps some of these conclusions can assist coaches and managers to better construct their teams and develop tactics. On the other hand, opposition teams could also use this information to devise counter plans.

Either way, its clear that a plenitude of information can produced by applying network science to soccer statistics and perhaps this connection can be a useful tool in further analyzing the beautiful game.

Source: https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1807/1807.00534.pdf